Judge Robert E. Beloten Appointed New York Workers Compensation Board Chairman

When I first started practicing workers' compensation law in the early 1990's at the Hempstead, NY hearing office,  Robert (Bob) Beloten was one of the sitting Workers' Compensation Law Judges. In many ways, I was very "green" and needed some guidance on how things "really worked" at the WCB.  Not only did Bob Beloten provide such guidance to me and other young attorneys at the time, he also made sure that our lack of experience did not harm our clients. That's what a good judge does- and Bob Beloten was certainly among the best.

When I was asked to present a seminar on workers compensation law at St. John's University Law School a few years back and needed a judge to offer his perspectives, I immediately reached out to Judge Beloten.  He graciously accepted and the law students at St. John's were treated to one of the finest seminars on judicial independence and philosophy in some time.

Bottom Line - Robert E. Beloten is a top notch workers' comp professional who has lived and breathed the workers' compensation law for most of his legal career. The NY Times has a nice article out today about Robert Beloten's appointment as WCB Chair.  Governor Paterson has made a wise choice in selecting the next Chairman of the New York State Workers' Compensation Board.  I wish him the best of luck!

NY Workers Compensation Board Chairman to become Social Security Disability Judge

I should have picked up the clues!  A few weeks ago I was speaking at the New York Social Security Disability Bar Association Annual Dinner in Manhattan.  This is always a great night for the Bench and the Bar break bread and have a few laughs.  I was there to speak about one of my favorite Social Security Judges, Andrew Weiss of the Long Island Office of Disability Adjudication and Review, who was receiving the prestigious Hon. Lester Rosen Award.  I have known Andy since his early days as a Workers Compensation Law Judge in Hempstead and he has a singularly unique blend of compassion and humor. 

Much to my surprise, in attendance was the current Chairman of the New York Workers' Compensation Board, Zachary S. Weiss (no relation).  Having attended these dinners for at least the last 15 years, I had never seen the Chair of the Workers' Comp Board enter the somewhat more calm sanctum of the Social Security Bar.  The Chair and I had a pleasant conversation over cocktails and it was my honor to introduce him later from the podium.  Other than that, I thought nothing more about the Chair's presence.

It all clicked  last Friday when the New York Times reported that Chairman Weiss was resigning from the Workers' Compensation Board to accept a position as a federal Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) for the Social Security Administration in the Jericho office.  My friends who are ALJ's had told me that offers went out to the new class of judges right about the same time as the Social Security Bar Dinner.  It was not a coincidence that Chairman Weiss was at the dinner - he was simply getting to know his future colleagues and the attorneys who might be appearing before him in the future!  Smart man!

As I said in an article published in WorkersComp Central regarding Chairman Weiss' resignation, he is quite simply a brilliant man.  I have spoken to him on many occasions. Although we have disagreed in the past on the substance of a few workers' compensation system issues, there is no question that his formidable intellect combined with compassion will directly benefit the individuals appearing before him in the future claiming Social Security Disability benefits.  Out of the often times murky waters of the NY workers' compensation system (click here for an interesting post from the Workers Comp Insider Blog), Zachary S. Weiss has emerged untarnished and renewed as a federal judge.  I wish him success and happiness in his new position adjudicating Social Security disability claims

Ground Zero Worker Daniel Arrigo Waits for Workers' Comp - Rosasco Says Sadly Familiar in Workers' Comp Central Article

Last week the New York Daily News had an excellent story by Heidi Evans detailing the battle 9/11 responder Daniel Arrigo has gone through to obtain his workers' compensation benefitsHere we are - nearly 8 years since the World Trade Center tragedy - and insurance companies are now  to fighting 9/11 workers comp claims harder than ever as the spotlight has shifted from terrorism to the economy.  Give the New York Daily News credit for keeping the spotlight shining bright on the health of  WTC first responders and volunteers.

In a follow-up to the Daily News article, I was interviewed by the leading trade publication on workers' compensation issues, Workcompcentral, on Mr. Arrigo's case.  In the article, I stated that Mr. Arrigo's plight is "sadly familiar" to those of us attorneys who handle 9/11 Ground Zero claims on a regular basis.  Sadly, there are many more "Daniel Arrigos" out there in need of  experienced Ground Zero workers' compensation lawyers because insurance companies fight legitimate claims with one hand, while asking for taxpayer bailouts with the otherDisgusting! 

Third Installment of New York Times Article on Workers' Compensation is Weakest Yet

Yada Yada Yada! The final installment of the NY Times series on the New York Workers' Compensation system is much like the first installment - a regurgitation of anecdotal pablum with quotes from disgruntled  workers and employers.  Again - a major disappointment after an 18 month investigation of the entire state-wide system. 

Where are the stories about the overwhelming majority of injured workers who sail through the system with few problems receiving all the benefits they deserve?  I guess such facts don't sell papers!

It seems that the reporters who wrote this series never truly understood the full extent of the mission of the New York State Workers' Compensation Board as an administrative agency processing hundreds of thousands of individual cases at any one time.  They never truly understood that the Workers' Compensation system was not created in a vacuum - and that, believe it or not - society actually benefits by having a little less safety in the workplace.

Professor Robert Smith, the distinguished labor economist at Cornell University's School of Industrial and Labor Relations, once taught me that employers are competitively better off paying workers' compensation premiums rather than trying to make their workplaces as safe as possible.  The cost of assuring 100% safety in the workplace would be astronomical and almost certainly impossible.  The cost of assuring 90% safety in the workplace would be prohibitive. 

Before employers ever went down that Utopian road, they would make a fast dash to ChinaTherefore, a sometimes imperfect, but  far more often successful workers' compensation system in New York is not only necessary - but desired.

How many of the grumbling employers quoted in the final installment employ "safety managers" in their plants? It seems that the "Safety Bucks" games that some employers use are a way of giving lip service to true worker safety.  Unfortunately, the New York Times has  given similar lip service to an important topic while venturing into the New York Post realm of reporting with silly tag-lines like "Meatball Justice". 

 

New York Times Article on Workers' Comp System Disappoints

Today's New York Times article on the NY Workers' Compensation system is a major disappointment  given that the paper spent 18 months preparing what is essentially an extended "human interest" story.  The article is filled with anecdotal reports of claimant suffering and unsubstantiated editorials masquerading as fact.  However, it is woefully short on actual statistics regarding the actual efficiency of the system, and gives only cursory reporting on the systemic ongoing reform efforts that will eventually correct some of the perceived inefficiencies.

Reading the article, one would incorrectly assume that all 140,000 workers injured statewide every year must navigate the  "subbasement of the legal world", as the authors unfortunately characterize the New York Workers' Compensation BoardNothing could be further from the truth!  The vast majority of injured workers receive both appropriate medical care and any lost wage replacement before ever having to step foot into a hearing office. 

Hearing offices today are left to resolve only the thorniest cases involving legal disputes over proper wage loss payments and medical careHad the authors cared to check, they would have discovered that actual hearings statewide have decreased dramatically in the past few years. A comparison of the number of workers compensation claims processed through the Queens District office in 2008 to the number of these same claimants who had hearings in the Queens hearing office would have been instructive.  However, this information is nowhere found in this article which places a priority on "sensationalism" rather than concrete facts.

One of my colleagues from the insurance defense side states in the article: "Comparing Supreme Court, say, to this is like comparing a hospital to a MASH unit".   He is absolutely correct!   MASH (Mobile Army Surgical Hospitals) units  have been a great success throughout  history and statistics show that over 97% of injured service men  and women who made it to MASH facilities survived their injuries.  And yes, doctors like "Hawkeye Pierce" cracked a few "bawdy" jokes while saving thousands of lives.  I'll take Hawkeye Pierce and a MASH unit (the New York Workers' Compensation Board ) any day over  a faceless hospital ( the Supreme Court) where your "cure "can kill you as you wait five years to get in front of a jury to address your injuries.  By comparison, the NY Workers' Compensation Board is enormously efficient compared to New York State Supreme Court.

The Workers' Compensation Board is much like an Emergency Room where "triage" is used to treat the sickest patients first.  You can improve waiting times in emergency rooms by adding more doctors.  You can improve waiting times at Workers' Compensation Board hearing points by adding more judges

Certainly, as in any large bureaucracy, there is always room for improvement.  However, even in the current imperfect system,  there are injured workers whose medical and economic lives are saved each and every day in that "subbasement" known as the New York Workers' Compensation Board.  Nowhere in the Times article is there a quote from an injured worker who was "grateful" or "pleased"  because she could now pay the mortgage as a result a positive hearing experience.  Attorneys for both claimants and insurance companies see such positive experiences every day.  As a regular reader of the NY Times, I have come to expect more analysis and less sensationalism from an 18 month investigation.   

 

Rosasco to Lecture on Workers' Compensation Claims at St. John's Law School

I'll be giving my annual New York Workers' Compensation Law lecture to the St. John's Law School Labor Relations and Employment Law Society this Wednesday, April 1, 2009 at 6:30 PM.  My friend David L. Gregory, the Dorothy Day Professor of Law, has asked me to speak on "real world" workers' comp issues to his students for over ten years now.  Just a few weeks ago,  NY AFL-CIO President Denis Hughes spoke to the same students on the "Future of Labor".  I am in good company.

Given the ongoing implementation of the 2007 New York Workers' Compensation Reform laws, which included an increase in benefits for injured workers, we will have a lot to discuss.  The program is open to the entire community but seating is limited. Hope to see you there!

Rosasco to Receive Clara Lemlich Public Service Award at Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire Memorial Dinner

I am humbled to have been selected a 2009 recipient of the Clara Lemlich Public Service Award from the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire Memorial Foundation for my work as Co-Chairman of the New York State Workers' Compensation Alliance.  My fellow recipients include  Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten, Injured Workers' Bar Association President Barbara Levine and the Hon. Edward I.Pitts, Co-Author of the New York Workers' Compensation Handbook published by LexisNexis

We will all be honored at a gala dinner on March 25, 2009, the 98th Anniversary of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire in which 146 workers lost their lives.  The dinner will be held at the New York City Fire Museum in lower Manhattan.  The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire Memorial, with the extraordinary volunteer efforts of it's President James McCarthyraises money to fund college scholarships for the children of permanently disabled workers. In the seven year history of the foundation, the Triangle Memorial has awarded over $180,000 in college scholarships. Click here for more information on attending the Triangle Fire Memorial Dinner and taking out a journal ad to help fund the scholarship program.  As a practicing New York workers' compensation and disability attorney, I can think of no higher honor than receiving the Clara Lemlich Public Service Award.

Wal-mart Now Under Criminal Investigation by Nassau DA Kathleen Rice for Worker Stampede Death

Nassau County District Attorney Kathleen Rice must have been reading the New York Disability Law Blog recently when we were the first to call for a criminal probe of Walmart's role in causing the death of it's employee, Jdimytai Damour.  As reported in Newsday, this aggressive prosecutor is willing to use the power of her office to place a bright light on worker safety AND employer responsibility.  She deserves the thanks of all working men and women in the New York area.  It's not every day that a public official is willing to stand up to Wal-mart.

Rather than see the fact's of the Damour case get buried by time and paper in a New York Workers' Compensation claim, DA Rice's investigation will hopefully make Walmart, and similar reckless retail employers, think twice before sponsoring "door-buster" "blitz" sales on the now appropriately named Black Friday.  Also credit the RWDSU and it's President, Stuart Appelbaum, for standing up to Wal-mart and placing the blame where it should be - Aisle #3!

New York Workers' Compensation Law Will Prevent Lawyer from Suing Wal-Mart Directly for Negligence

It has now been one week since the sad death of Walmart worker Jdimytai Damour, and of course, this being New York,  the lawsuits are already flying.  One attorney has filed a lawsuit for the family against Walmart in the Bronx (where else!) claiming Walmart was "careless, reckless and negligent".  In my opinion, the direct lawsuit against Walmart for negligence will be dismissed promptly. 

Mr. Damour's family cannot sue Walmart directly due to the "exclusive remedy" provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law.  Filing a negligence lawsuit directly against Walmart probably had more to do with the attorney getting his name in the news than actually holding Walmart responsible.  And some question why lawyers have a bad image?

Based upon the reported facts,  Mr. Damour worked for a temporary staffing firm called Labor Ready.  Walmart contracted with Labor Ready for temporary workers to fill holiday staffing needs. In this case, the legal concept of a "General/Special" employer-employee relationship would come into play.  If Walmart exerted "direction and control" over Mr. Damour (ie, "go unlock the doors and let the lions in"), then Walmart is considered a "Special Employer" even if Mr. Damour got his paycheck from Labor Ready. 

Once Walmart is deemed a "Special Employer", it is protected from any direct lawsuit for negligence by the exclusive remedy provisions of the NY Workers' Compensation Law.  Without any fanfare, Walmart will quickly move to dismiss the lawsuit based upon the defense that workers' comp is the exclusive remedy.  As I said in a prior post, the Damour family will get a measly one time $50,000 payment to his estate (plus a $6,000 expense) for the life of their loved one under the workers' compensation law, and they probably don't need an attorney.  

Workers' Comp Central has been quoting me in their articles this week regarding the tragedy.  Here are a few excerpts from those articles for those of you without a subscription:

A top officer of the New York Workers' Compensation Alliance is calling for a criminal investigation by state Attorney General Andrew Cuomo into the death of a temporary worker trampled in the rush for bargains at a Long Island Walmart Store before sunrise last Friday.
Troy Rosasco, co-chairman of the workers' advocates group, said Monday the world's largest retailer is shielded from a lawsuit in the death of 34-year-old Jdimytai Damour because of New York state's exclusive remedy law.

"He had never worked for Wal-Mart before. This was like sending a guy into the (Roman) Coliseum and telling him to unchain the door and let the lions in," Rosasco said. "What happened was foreseeable. They created a danger when they called it a blitz sale. A blitz is defined by Merriam Webster as a sudden attack."

Walmart may be sued by the mall or security company for contribution, but it cannot be sued by the Damour family itself.  They only have a workers' compensation death benefits claim against Walmart. This is another reason NY Attorney General Andrew Cuomo should investigate this terrible tragedy brought on by Walmart's greed. 

 

 

 

 

Walmart Criminally Responsible for "Door-Buster" Sale Worker Death?

Photos courtesy of Newsday

In the wake of yesterday's Black Friday Walmart tragedyone's first reaction might be to blame the alleged "savages" who trampled the innocent Walmart worker. However, in reality, it was Walmart's greed and disregard for it's own workers' safety that caused the preventable death of Jdimytai Damour.  New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo should launch an immediate criminal investigation against WalmartThe days of government "looking the other way" while worker safety is ignored must come to an end.

Walmart had a calculated plan to create a shoppers'  "feeding frenzy" between 5 and 11 a.m. yesterday during it's "blitz", "door-buster" sale.  When it offered incredible deals on "hot toys" such as plasma TV's to hungry shoppers, it was really doing nothing more than throwing "blood into shark infested waters".  

Just look at the the language Walmart used to create the climate necessary for this horrific event.   For the non-football fans out there, both common usage and the Miriam Webster dictionary define the word "blitz" as a  "sudden attack", which can easily describe the rush of shoppers Walmart anticipated and invited yesterday.  The fact that such sales are known as "door-buster" sales clearly puts Walmart on notice of the imminent danger they were creating, not just for its own employees, but for shoppers alike.  It was only divine intervention that stopped a shopper 8 months pregnant from losing her baby in the same stampede.

Walmart is a smart, highly successful consumer retailer - with a horrible record of mistreatment of employees.  They fully understand the concept of "mob psychology" that caused this preventable death, but willfully chose to ignore the threat to fill it's own cash registers.  In my opinion, the police do not need to check the store "video-tape" to find the party responsible for this homicide.  Just check the sign outside.

This is no different than when Ford willfully decided not to recall the defective Ford Pinto gas tank  in favor of profits over safety.  Despite Walmart employee requests to close the store after the tragedy, Walmart allowed all important "shopping" to continue. Shame on Walmart for being so callous. The profits from a single store on a single day would not even register on the Walmart (or Wall Street) radar screen.    

Of course, Walmart is protected from a direct lawsuit in this case by the New York State Workers' Compensation Law. Mr. Damour's family will receive a measly $6,000 burial allowance under the law.  You can be sure that Walmart's public relations agency has been working overtime the past 24 hours to minimize any negative publicity due to the death. After all, this is Christmas season - a time of charity and goodwill!

New York  Attorney General Andrew Cuomo should launch an immediate investigation into whether Walmart's actions ( or failures to act) leading to the death of it's own worker are criminal.  There is ample legal precedent for such prosecutions. Certainly, even if not criminal,  they further highlight Walmart's corporate irresponsibility toward the safety of both workers and consumers. The costs associated with a small workers' compensation claim of a dead worker will be fully absorbed in no more than 1 minute of Walmart shopping at the Valley Stream store.  What say you, Mr. Cuomo?  What say you, Mr. Public?! 

 

Workers' Compensation Attorney Troy Rosasco Interviewed for ABC News Story on Undocumented Worker Construction Accident Deaths

ABC News published an important article today highlighting the sharp rise in immigrant worker deaths on construction sites in the New York City area.  This problem, which I addressed in a prior post recently, is reaching epidemic proportions

As detailed in the article, just the other day a Ukrainian immigrant was decapitated after plunging 42 stories while working on a construction site on a Donald Trump Hotel in lower Manhattan.  Under the current New York Workers' Compensation law, the most his widow and children can collect for his death is $500 per week, plus payment of only $6000 toward his funeral bill

I told the reporter the story of one of my clients (an undocumented worker) who was severely injured last November when a brick wall fell on him while working on a construction site in Queens.  Despite multiple surgeries and being an inpatient at Jamaica Hospital for over a week, he still has not received his first workers' compensation check.  This is not unusual in cases where unscrupulous employers are paying immigrant workers "off-the-books" and not reporting their wages to the workers' compensation insurance company to save on premiums.  Workers' compensation lawyers like myself see sad cases like these every day.

Thanks to Susan Donaldson James  and ABC News for reporting on this growing tragedy.  Unfortunately, in the current political climate, it is questionable whether the federal government has any desire to address the safety of undocumented workers on construction sites??? 

 

Workers' Compensation Construction Accident Deaths Soar in NYC

Being a construction worker in New York City is becoming more deadly, according to new reports from the Federal Bureau of Labor Statistics.  Amid a building boom in New York, construction worker accident related deaths are up 87% since 2005

As the NY Times reported earlier this year on construction deaths, Mayor Michael Bloomberg has already taken some positive health and safety inspection measures to stem work related scaffold and ladder accidents in New York City.  However, it appears that part of the problem involves the intractable immigration crisis

Many shady construction general contractors and sub-contractors are hiring non-union undocumented workers who are not given adequate safety training or equipment.  As can be expected, the death toll is falling disproportionately on Latino construction workers.  This is because the percentage of Latin and Mexican construction workers are growing by leaps and bounds.  In addition, immigrants from India, Poland and other Eastern European countries are increasing on non-union (i.e., less safe) work sites. 

The workers' compensation lawyers at Turley, Redmond & Rosasco have unfortunately witnessed the impact of construction accident deaths on families first hand.  Hopefully, the issue of immigrant construction worker safety in NYC will be studied by the newly confirmed Chair of the NY Workers' Compensation Board, Zachary S Weiss.  As Governor Spitzer so correctly notes, we cannot stick our heads in the sand and pretend these immigrant workers do not exist.  These are real human beings who are dying almost every day, sometimes due to employer greed trying to avoid paying union wages.  Let us not build our gleaming New York City skyline on a foundation of blood.

The Forgotten 9/11 Ground Zero Heroes

   Marie Cocco of the Washington Post has a great column today profiling one of our clients, Jeanmarie DeBiase, the widow of 9/11 hero Mark DeBiase.  While sick police officers and firefighters have received much deserved attention, workers in a variety of occupations, without whom the Ground Zero clean-up could not have been possible, have not received the same level of press.  Mark was a wireless phone technician who set up emergency communications for other 9/11 rescue and first responders and volunteers.  He died on April 9, 2006 due to interstitial lung disease caused by exposure to dust and toxins at the Fresh Kills landfill, where the World Trade Center debris was trucked.  

More importantly, they have not received the same level of medical and monetary support as the police and firefighters.  Many have lost their health insurance for both themselves and their families. Many ill workers continue to struggle as they fight workers' compensation claims being vigorously fought by employers who have forgotten the meaning of the word "compassion".  On this sixth anniversary of the collapse of the Twin Towers, may we all re-dedicate ourselves to helping families who cannot "move on" from September 11, 2001. 

Happy Labor Day from the Disability Law Firm of Turley, Redmond & Rosasco

To all workers who toil each day to make America great, the the attorneys and staff at Turley, Redmond & Rosasco wish you a much deserved and restful Labor Day.  Enjoy!  See you next week.

9/11 Workers' Compensation Press Conference Launching Poster Campaign Slated for 9/4/07

As we approach the sixth anniversary of the 9/11 tragedy, legal and health issues arising out of Ground Zero continue to top the headlines.  First, NYCOSH has announced a press conference for next Tuesday, 9/4/07,  at 11:00 am at the South entrance to PATH trains at the former World Trade Center site on Church Street.  The press conference, which will include New York State Labor Commissioner M. Patricia Smith, Art Wilcox of the AFL-CIO and representatives of Senate Majority leader Joe Bruno,  will announce a new subway poster campaign encouraging 9/11 Rescue, Recovery and Cleanup Workers and Volunteers to register for benefits with the New York Workers' Compensation BoardWe will report any additional information after the press conference.

As previously reported on the New York Workers' Compensation Alliance website, the deadline to register for these benefits has been extended until August 14, 2008.  You  can download a World Trade Center Registration Form here. In addition, this week saw an important Newsday article reporting about a new New York City Department of Health study showing that Ground Zero rescue and recovery workers have a 12 times higher incidence of asthma.  This bolsters the anecdotal evidence and filing of claims by our workers' compensation attorneys for WTC workers over the past few years.  

Our workers' compensation lawyers continue to work daily with Ground Zero rescue, recovery and cleanup workers and volunteers to protect their rights to future medical attention.  The new poster campaign will help those who have not yet registered.   Remember- you should register now even if you are still healthy to protect your rights later.  If you have any questions, call toll free 1-877-NY-DBLAW to speak to one of our attorneys for a free consultation.

New York Workers' Compensation Lawyer Nominated for Legislature

Congratulations to Turley, Redmond & Rosasco, LLP founder William J. Turley on being nominated last night as the Democratic candidate for the Suffolk County Legislature's 13th District, as detailed in today's Newsday

Besides being one of Long Island's leading workers' compensation lawyers, Bill will be an excellent county legislator come this November.  Bill was recently the sole honoree of the New York Workers' Compensation Bar at a fundraiser for "One in Nine", the breast cancer advocacy group.  Needless to say, everyone at our firm is extremely proud of Bill's past and future accomplishments.  Go Bill!

Long Island Verizon Sylvania Nuclear Waste Site Conspiracy?

That's what Adreinne Esposito, Executive Director of the Citizens' Campaign for the Environment, called the growing controversy regarding Verizon's radiation contaminated property located in Hicksville, New York  in a recent News 12 Long Island television report on the former Sylvania Nuclear Products facility.  See the full video here.

After Newsday's first story broke about our client's cancer related to his work at this site for Magazine Distributors, Inc.,  a division of Hudson News, in an article few weeks weeks ago, the unanswered questions regarding the dangers at this toxic site are rapidly expanding.  Newsday later followed up a week later with another story unearthing a previously unreleased Army Corp of Engineers report dated November 2005 showing worse contamination than previously thought

Why did the federal Army Corp of Engineers sit on the Hicksville Sylvania Nuclear Waste Site report for almost two years and release it only to Verizon ( a defendant in a billion dollar lawsuit brought by local residents alleging increased cancer risks) and the New York DEC?  Way back in 2004, New York Senator Chuck Schumer and US Representative Peter King announced, "It's the federal government that created this mess, it's the federal government that should fix it".  Did they "fix" this radioactive site located smack in the middle of Long Island suburbia, or did  powerful corporate and governmental interests  try to sweep this one under the rug

According to Ms. Esposito of Citizens' Campaign for the Environment, " Instead of being honest with the public, they covered it up.  That is negligence on the part of the federal government and that's a conspiracy to keep the public in the dark". 

One thing we know is that Senator Chuck Schumer and Congressman Pete King are scrappy fighters determined to protect the health and welfare of both Hicksville residents and all Long Island workers who worked at the employers located on the Verizon property.  The New York State Workers' Compensation Board already ruled that our client contracted a rare and deadly cancer, extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma,  while working on this site for a tenant of Verizon.  As George Johnson, a neighbor of the site for seven years, so appropriately said in the News 12 video, "How many people have to die before something happens, before we do the right thing". 

Let's hope Senator Schumer and Congressman King can get the Army Corp of Engineers and Verizon to do the right thing and clean up this site  with all deliberate speed.  

NY Workers' Compensation Board Finds Cancer Linked to Radiation at Hicksville Nuclear Waste Site

Yesterday's Newsday had a disturbing article regarding the radiation related health risks to workers who worked on or around the Hicksville, Long Island, Sylvania Nuclear Waste Site ,now owned by Verizon.  Our office recently won a workers' compensation claim for a worker who contracted a rare cancer, extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma, due to ionizing radiation and other toxins while working on this site for Magazine Distributors, Inc.,  a division of Hudson NewsIf I were a worker at this site or knew someone who worked near there, I would read this article carefully.

This nuclear waste site, located at 70,100 and 140 Cantiague Rock Road, Hicksville, NY was operated by Sylvania between 1952 and 1967 and was licensed by the US Atomic Energy Commission to manufacture nuclear fuel rods for use during the Cold War.  The radioactive elements uranium-235 and thorium were processed and milled at the facility.  The uranium and thorium were then subject to machining, grinding and incineration.  The facility then burned sludge to reclaim more uranium.

In addition, the Sylvania plant, although unauthorized to do so, burned scrap uranium as a three shift, seven day a week operation until 1960Large 55 gallon drums of uranium scrap metal were burned on site.  During the ongoing site clean-up, 55 gallon drums have been found buried at the site.  In addition to the radioactive substances, the site is contaminated with tetrachloroethene, trichloroethene and nickel.  Someone described the site as the location of a "dirty bomb".

Verizon, the current owner of the site, set aside $240 million for the ongoing clean-up which is now being monitored by both the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the Army Corp of EngineersRecent documents obtained by our lawyers during the litigation indicate that there may be more contamination than originally thought below the 100 building, the former location of Magazine Distributors, Inc.  

On November 9, 2006, the Hicksville Water District warned residents of of higher than allowed concentrations of tetrachloroethylene (a toxin found on the site)  in the drinking water from one of their supply wells and the potential cancer risks it might cause.  The well was immediately taken out of service.

Currently, neither the Army Corp of Engineers nor the New York State DEC nor Verizon are releasing statements about the what is currently being found on this dangerous site.  Thousands of pounds of contaminated soil have been carefully transported to Envirocare in UtahIn 2004,  New York Senator Schumer  stated that "it's the federal government that created this mess, it should be the federal government that fixes it".  To date, the public doesn't know the current status of the site and when or if it will be properly cleaned up.  In the meantime, more workers and local residents are getting gravely illPerhaps it's time for Senator Schumer to get to the bottom of this quagmire and let the public know the current health risks on the site.

As reported in Newsday, the lawsuit brought by local residents against the property owner, Verizon, for their increased cancer risk was recently settled for approximately $11 million.  The New York Department of Environmental Conservation is currently prosecuting  lawsuits arising from this site in federal court in Central Islip.  As stated in the Newsday article, this toxic waste dump could have impacts like those facing 9/11  rescue workersWorkers on this site, which also included the companies Air Techniques and Gilbert Displays, could be facing cancer and other health problems for years to come.   Scary stuff!

 

 

 

 

 

Nassau Lawyer Speaks on New York Workers' Compensation Reform Bill

I was interviewed the other day by WorkersComp Central, a national on-line newspaper dedicated to workers' compensation issues, on the impact of the new Spitzer New York Workers' Comp Reform Bill.  This bill passed both the Senate and the Assembly unanimously yesterday and is expected to be signed by Governor Spitzer next Tuesday.  The new law takes effect July 1, 2007,  and the changes are transformative - to say the least.  For attorneys who have practiced law in this administrative and technical forum many years, the changes will test our ability to adapt to radically new benefit structure.  It should be interesting!  

Insight on Spitzer's New York Workers' Compensation Reform Agreement

Over the past few months, you may have noticed a precipitous drop in the number of posts to the New York Disability Lawyer Blog.   However, as Co-Chair of the New York Workers' Compensation AllianceI've been doing the Albany shuffle along with some of my dedicated colleagues in an attempt to protect injured workers from any disastrous workers' comp reform.  Well - were in the ninth inning now given Governor Spitzer's press conference today announcing a workers' compensation reform agreement between all the major players at the bargaining tableIt's been a long but hopefully worthwhile fight.

Give New York Governor Eliot Spitzer credit - he played his cards in the workers' compensation reform deal brilliantly and in the process has undone one of the pillars of the original law that was on the books for nearly 100 years - the permanent partial disability pension.  That's not to say that this pillar was not crumbling of it's own weight and didn't need some reforming. After all, it had been around since the assassination of Prince Archduke Francis Ferdinand!  But like a historic neighborhood that is indelibly disturbed by the need for a three lane highway, it was rather sad to watch, especially for those of us who are a bit nostalgic when it comes to labor history.  The price of progress!

So, who are the winners and losers in the new reform deal? Aside from the obvious political winners -Governor Spitzer, Assembly Speaker Silver and  Senate Majority Leader Bruno- who all seemed to be playing nicely in the rose garden, the winners are as follows:

  • Injured workers earning over $600 per week, who will now see an immediate potential benefit increase;
  • Injured workers who will have greater access to real job retraining and rehabilitation;
  • Injured workers whose authorization for appropriate medical care will be sped up;
  • Injured workers whose claims will be resolved quicker due to the implementation of the new "Rocket Docket" proposed by the Workers' Compensation Alliance;
  • Employers who should see a 10-15% decrease in workers' comp premiums;
  • Honest employers who will no longer subsidize cheating employers due to new criminal employer fraud penalties;
  • Doctors who often waited months for authorization for much needed surgeries for their patients.

Now, as in any hard fought compromise,the inevitable losers:

  • Injured workers with permanent partial disabilities who cannot be rehabilitated for other work (i.e. the 58 year old carpenter with no high school degree, among others);
  • Injured workers earning less than $600 per week;
  • Dishonest employers who will now face felony criminal charges;
  • The New York Compensation Rating Board, which will be abolished;
  • The "Second Injury Fund", which will be phased out of existence;
  • Any others that we discover once the actual written bill details are released.

Teddy Roosevelt - excuse me...Eliot Spitzer! - chocks up one more win on the scorched earth reform path.

 

 

 

Lawyers Give Joint Seminar on Ground Zero Workers' Compensation Claims and Lawsuits

It was my pleasure to give a seminar recently to volunteer firefighters at the Bellmore Fire District on Long Island about their rights to workers' compensation (even as volunteers) under the new 9/11 Rescue Workers' Law.   Andrew Carboy and Beth Jablon of Sullivan, Papain, Block, McGrath & Cannavo also gave an excellent presentation on the rights of the volunteer firefighters to sue the City of New York if they worked at Ground Zero and later develop cancer or breathing problems.  For instance, I met one firefighter who developed tongue cancer after working at Ground Zero but had never touched a cigarette in his life.  Unfortunately, such stories are becoming more and more common these days as I field these unfortunate callers on almost a daily basis.

The firehouse was packed and we handed out many Workers' Compensation Ground Zero registration forms and many firefighters completed the forms right then and there.  I thank both Andy Carboy and Joe Pusateri, Esq. for asking me to assist with this presentation.   As of today,  there are only 189 days left to register with the Workers' Compensation BoardEven if you are not ill now, please download this form today and send it to the New York Workers' Compensation Board ASAP.  It could be a free disability or life insurance policy for your family.   If you have questions about how to fill out  the form, do not hesitate to call our office at 1-877-NY-DBLAW.  

 

 

New Year, New Format for New York Disability Law Blog!

Welcome to the newly designed New York Disability Law Blog!  As you will notice, I changed the official title of the blog from "The Disabled Worker Law Blog" to the  more informational "New York Disability Law Blog".  This is in keeping with the blog's purpose of providing useful information and insight regarding disability claims to fellow attorneys and the general public

To this end, I am excited to announce the creation of the blog's "Disability Law Library" which will be continually added to and updated.  I hope that this will eventually become the first place attorneys and claimant's turn to when researching disability claims and legal issues.  Still in it's formative stages, the library will have sections on long term disability and ERISA claims, Social Security  disability, New York workers' compensation, civil service disability pensions, scaffold /ladder /construction site lawsuits and a new section on the unfortunate expanding area of veterans' disability claims.

In addition, in 2007 we hope to do a better job collaborating with fellow bloggers such as Jonathan Ginsberg and his excellent Social Security Disability Radio Blog.  Please feel free to comment about the new design and let me know how the New York Disability Law Blog can better serve your needs.  Talk to you soon.

Long Island Workers' Comp Lawyer Interviewed on NY Workers' Comp Reform

As Co-Chair of the New York Workers' Compensation Alliance, I was interviewed for an article published Monday at the  Workers' Comp Central web site on the upcoming workers' compensation reform debate in Albany under the new Spitzer administration

Short Version - severely injured workers are going to have to fight hard to protect their rights to lifetime workers' comp benefits when they have permanent partial disabilities and are no longer employable.  With the help of the New York State Business Council and the ever present insurance lobby, the debate  is trying to be shifted from protecting workers with horrendous injuries to re-invigorating the dormant upstate economy.  While we all support bringing more jobs back to upstate New York, there are no independent credible studies linking increased workers' compensation costs to a decline in the upstate economyIf workers' comp costs were such a drain on business, why hasn't it had a similar impact on the downstate economy

Workers' comp costs declined after the 1996 reforms under Governor Pataki.  Did this jump start the upstate economy?  Workers' compensation seems to be the easy whipping boy by some for all of upstate's economic woes.  Sure - take it out ion the lady with no hand after it was caught in a machine at work.   Thankfully, Governor-Elect Spitzer has surrounded himself with some of the sharpest policy advisors in New York.  I have no doubt they will be able to think "outside the box" and find solutions to the upstate economic problems without hurting permanently disabled workers.

The entire article is below:

New York -- Spitzer Expected to Make Sweeping Changes in NY Comp: Top [12/11/06]

An alliance of New York attorneys and other advocates representing 200,000 injured workers called for sweeping reforms in the state's workers' compensation system Friday and said it has high hopes for Gov.-elect Eliot Spitzer.

"We think he's going to take a hard look at insurance companies before he proposes any major change in workers' compensation," said Troy Rosasco, who co-chairs the New York State Workers' Compensation Alliance.

"There are already meetings going on, and the time will be sooner rather than later," Rosasco said. "I would think we would have substantial workers' comp reform of some sort or another within the first six months of the Spitzer administration."

Spitzer's transition team did not respond to a request for an interview Friday. And the veteran state attorney general is keeping his own plans for workers' compensation reform close to his vest.

He has told participants in a series of meetings intended to forge a compromise among employers, claimants' attorneys and the unions that they won't get a preview of his plans until his inauguration next month.

But Spitzer gained national attention with a string of major settlements with insurers over allegations of accounting irregularities and the payment of illegal contingent fees to secure business.

Most notably, Spitzer signed a record-setting $1.65 billion settlement with American International Group in February, after he accused the insurance giant of cooking its books to smooth out quarterly financial earnings reports.

That surpassed his $850 million agreement with Marsh & McLennan over its use of continent commissions paid to brokers.

And the AIG case led to the ouster of former company CEO Maurice "Hank" Greenberg and his chief financial officer, Howard Smith, as well as a string of ongoing civil and criminal cases.

"He's a good sheriff of the industry," Rosasco said.

With the New York State Assembly set to return to Albany in January, Spitzer has promised to call a summit meeting of shareholders in workers' compensation.

Reforming the system was a major part of his campaign, along with rescuing the beleaguered economy of upstate New York.

The state of the economy has pitted the alliance against the Business Council of New York State and its affiliate, New York Workers' Compensation Action Network (NYCAN).

NYCAN has called on Spitzer to impose the state's first cap on permanent partial disability, saying the PPDs account for 15% of the state's workers' compensation cases and 75% of the expenditures.

The alliance is opposing the caps and pushing hard to raise the maximum weekly benefit for injured workers, which has been capped at $400 since 1992.

On Friday, the alliance called for increasing the maximum benefit to two-thirds of the state average weekly wage. Suggesting a phased-in payment schedule, the alliance also is seeking to raise the minimum weekly rate from $40 to $120.

The alliance wants to raise the benefit amount under the state's Disability Benefits Law to one-half the claimant's average weekly wage without a maximum limit. And it wants Spitzer and lawmakers to require the state Workers' Compensation Board to set a future revaluation date for workers with PPDs, at which time the worker would have to demonstrate an attempt to reenter the labor market.

The proposals released Friday would increase the dollar limit for required pre-approval of medical services from $500 to $1,200 and require private carriers to pay for medical care while workers' compensation claims are pending.

Finally, the proposals would abolish the Compensation Insurance Rating Board and transfer the job of ratemaking classification to state government.

"The biggest issue and the biggest stumbling block we will face in the upcoming negotiations is how injured workers with permanent partial disabilities are treated," Rosasco said. "If he (Spitzer) were to implement a cap, those who remain out of work will become wards of the state welfare system."

Citing upstate New York's depressed economy, NYCAN said in is recently call for action from Spitzer that brokering a compromise on workers' compensation is "the best way to send a signal that he will boost upstate's fortunes."

NYCAN warned that New York has the second-highest average workers' compensation claims in the nation despite the fact that its maximum weekly benefit hasn't changed in more than a decade.

The group said employers' costs are 15% above the national average. Average claims are more than $16,000, up from $11,793 two years ago.

The group called for limiting PPD awards to 10 years.

Current Gov. George Pataki proposed reforms a year ago and said he would slash employers' costs by more than 15% while boosting benefits by 25% for injured workers.

But Pataki's package ended in a legislative gridlock during the 2006 session. Rosasco said he expects Spitzer to fare better, if workers' advocates succeed in severing the issue from the economic fortunes of upstate New York.

"There is no evidence that says the upstate economy has been hurt by workers' compensation costs," Rosasco said. "Frankly, they have not been able to attract business after a large part of the manufacturing base left for Southeast Asia."

--By Michael Whiteley, WorkCompCentral Southeast Bureau Chief
mike@workcompcentral.com

 

 

 

NY Attorney General Spitzer Fines Disability Claim Insurer UnumProvident

Need another reason to vote for Eliot Spitzer for New York Governor tomorrow?  This guy just keeps on working for the little guy (including one of my corporate executive clients receiving over $400,000 per year in disability payments from UnumProvident) and fighting greedy insurance companies right up to his presumptive landslide win on Election Day. This wasn't about getting votes (he doesn't need  any more at this point) - it was about doing the right thing for disabled workers.

Late last week, Unum agreed to $15.5 million dollars in restitution to over charged policyholders and a $1.7 million dollar civil penalty. This settlement with UnumProvident, the nation's beleaguered yet largest long term disability claim insurer, comes on the heels of Spitzer's prior settlement with UnumProvident requiring them to re-access tens of thousands of previous unfair long term disability claim denialsGive Eliot Spitzer credit and your vote tommorrow - to date, he has done more to protect injured and disabled than any past NY Attorney General of recent memory.  Now let's hope he protects New York workers' compensation claimants just as well in his new role as Governor!

 

Federal Judge Clears Way for 9/11 Ground Zero / WTC Lawsuits

In a huge victory for Ground Zero workers, federal judge Alvin Hellerstein issued a 99 page ruling yesterday giving these heroes the opportunity to sue the City of New York, private contractors and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey for their 9/11 related illnesses.

In the last few months, after the passage of the new 9/11 workers' compensation law,  our workers' compensation attorneys have been deluged with calls from Ground Zero workers with various illness's they believe are related to exposure to toxins at Ground Zero.  In addition to new workers' comp claims, they may now also be entitled to have an additional lawsuit against the City of New York for failing to warn them of the dangerous and sometimes deadly conditions at the former World Trade Center site.  Turley, Redmond & Rosasco is working with one of the "lead counsels" in New York City bringing this important law suit.

The most affected group of workers are police, firefighters, EMS, sanitation workers, transportation workersconstruction workers, National Guardsmen and other first responders.  The most common illness's workers' comp lawyers see among these groups include asthma, reactive airway disease, interstitial lung disease and the following cancers: lung cancer, esophagus cancer, stomach cancer, bladder cancer, colon cancer, leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma.  

If you or a family member believe your illness is related to working or volunteering at Ground Zero, please feel free to contact Troy Rosasco toll free at 1-877-NY-DBLAW, ext 123 to discuss your legal options. 

 

NEW 9/11 Workers' Comp Benefits Fact Sheet Available

Our good friends at the New York Committee for Occupational Health (NYCOSH) recently put out an excellent fact sheet on the new 9/11 workers' compensation benefits for rescue workers and first responders.  All New York workers' compensation lawyers should distribute this fact sheet to their eligible clients and medical providers.   Please print this sheet out and pass the word.  The  new business and labor coalition in New York,  BALCONY , is doing a great job disseminating this information.  Keep up the great work BALCONY!

In addition, here's the link to the New York State Workers' Compensation Board's new Registration Form, WTC-12All employees and/or volunteers who participated in rescue, recovery or cleanup operations at the World Trade Center Site or other "qualifying sites" must file this form with the Workers Compensation Board no later than August 14, 2007This includes those participants who are not currently sickFailure to do so may preclude you from making a workers' compensation claim in the future.  Therefore, if you were one of the  heroes at Ground Zero, protect yourself and your family and do it now!  Feel free to call us toll free with any questions at 1-877-NY-DBLAW.

Synopsis of 2006 New York Workers' Comp Bills Passed in Albany

The New York Workers' Compensation Alliance, a lobbying group and political action committee (PAC) protecting injured workers, just published an excellent synopsis of all 2006 NY Workers' Comp bills that were passed in Albany.  Check it out.

Thankfully, we were successful this year in heading off some of the disastrous workers' comp bills pushed by insurance companies and big business.  No doubt they will be back next year with other draconian "reform" measures, but we'll be ready to expose their true motives - profits at the expense of permanently disabled workers!

New York Legislature Passes New 9/11 Workers Comp Bill to Protect Ground Zero Claimants


Congratulations to the New York State Assembly and New York State Senate for passing an amendment to the NY Workers' Compensation Law (new Article 8-A) which will grant new rights and benefits to ill 9/11 rescue, recovery, clean-up workers and volunteers who worked at Ground Zero after the World Trade Center tragedy. Thanks to the hard work and diligent efforts of many individuals and organizations, including the NY Workers' Compensation Alliance,  who pushed for passage of this important bill, these heroes will now have their health and economic security protected.

The new "9/11 Bill" allows workers who later become ill with conditions such as asthma, chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD), asbestosis, mesothelioma or cancer to file their claims as "occupational diseases". This change essentially extends their time to file a claim to two years from the "date of disablement", rather than two years from the date of exposure exposure which resulted in the denial of many claims to date. Claimants who have had 9/11 disease cases disallowed for late claim filing (statute of limitations) problems can now re-open those denials. Anyone with a 9/11 claim previously denied due to lateness should contact a workers compensation attorney immediately. Turley, Redmond & Rosasco has been handling 9/11 workers' comp and disability claims since the WTC tragedy.  Our attorneys have written numerous articles and lectured at local law schools regarding 9/11 workers' compensation claimsAny rescue, recovery, or clean up worker whose claim was previously denied or believes their current illness is related to work at Ground Zero is invited to call us for a FREE CONSULTATION.  That's the least we can do for our 9/11 heroes.  The entire text of the new 9/11 workers' comp bill is below:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AN ACT to amend the workers' compensation law, in relation to claims for
illnesses sustained by workers who participated in the rescue, recov-
ery and clean-up effort following the terrorist attack at the World
Trade Center on September 11, 2001

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
bly, do enact as follows:

1 Section 1. The workers' compensation law is amended by adding a new
2 article 8-a to read as follows:
3 ARTICLE 8-A
4 WORLD TRADE CENTER RESCUE, RECOVERY AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS
5 Section 161. Definitions.
6 162. Registration of participation in World Trade Center rescue,
7 recovery and clean-up operations.
8 163. Notice; participants in the World Trade Center rescue,
9 recovery and clean-up operations.
10 164. Disablement of a participant in World Trade Center rescue,
11 recovery and clean-up operations treated as an accident.
12 165. Reopening of disallowed claims.
13 166. Liability of employer and insurance carrier.
14 167. Claims of volunteers.
15 § 161. Definitions. Whenever used in this article:
16 1. "Participant in World Trade Center rescue, recovery, or cleanup
17 operations" means any (a) employee who within the course of employment,
18 or (b) volunteer upon presentation to the board of evidence satisfactory
19 to the board that he or she:
20 (i) participated in the rescue, recovery, or cleanup operations at the
21 World Trade Center site between September eleventh, two thousand one and
22 September twelfth, two thousand two; or
23 (ii) worked at the Fresh Kills Land Fill in New York city between
24 September eleventh, two thousand one and September twelfth, two thousand
25 two, or

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD17509-01-6
S. 8348 2

1 (iii) worked at the New York city morgue or the temporary morgue on
2 pier locations on the west side of Manhattan between September eleventh,
3 two thousand one and September twelfth, two thousand two, or
4 (iv) worked on the barges between the west side of Manhattan and the
5 Fresh Kills Land Fill in New York city between September eleventh, two
6 thousand one and September twelfth, two thousand two.
7 2. "World Trade Center site" means anywhere below a line starting from
8 the Hudson River and Canal Street; east on Canal Street to Pike Street;
9 south on Pike Street to the East River; and extending to the lower tip
10 of Manhattan.
11 3. "Qualifying condition" means any latent disease or condition
12 resulting from a hazardous exposure during participation in World Trade
13 Center rescue, recovery or clean-up operations.
14 4. "Disablement" shall have the same meaning as defined in section
15 thirty-seven of this chapter and determined by the board in the same
16 manner as provided in section forty-two of this chapter.
17 § 162. Registration of participation in World Trade Center rescue,
18 recovery and clean-up operations. In order for the claim of a partic-
19 ipant in World Trade Center rescue, recovery and clean-up operations to
20 come within the application of this article, such participant must file
21 a written and sworn statement with the board on a form promulgated by
22 the chair indicating the dates and locations of such participation and
23 the name of such participant's employer during the period of partic-
24 ipation. Such statement must be filed not later than one year after the
25 effective date of this article. The board shall transmit a copy of such
26 statement to the employer or carrier named therein. The filing of such a
27 statement shall not be considered the filing of a claim for benefits
28 under this chapter.
29 § 163. Notice; participants in the World Trade Center rescue, recovery
30 and clean-up operations. The notice requirements for injury or death
31 resulting from a qualifying condition for a participant in World Trade
32 Center rescue, recovery and clean-up operations shall be the same as set
33 forth in section eighteen of this chapter, except that the notice shall
34 be given to the employer, or in the case of a volunteer, to the board,
35 within two years after the disablement of the participant or after the
36 participant knew or should have known that the qualifying condition was
37 causally related to his or her participation in World Trade Center
38 rescue, recovery and clean-up operations, whichever is the later date.
39 § 164. Disablement of a participant in World Trade Center rescue,
40 recovery and clean-up operations treated as an accident. The date of
41 disablement of a participant in World Trade Center rescue, recovery and
42 clean-up operations resulting from a qualifying condition that is
43 causally related to such participant shall be treated as the happening
44 of an accident within the meaning of this chapter and the procedure and
45 practice provided in this chapter shall apply to all proceedings under
46 this article, except where otherwise specifically provided herein.
47 § 165. Reopening of disallowed claims. The board, upon receiving a
48 statement duly filed as required under section one hundred sixty-two of
49 this article, from a participant in World Trade Center rescue, recovery
50 and clean-up operations for a qualifying condition that was disallowed
51 as barred by section eighteen or section twenty-eight of this chapter
52 shall reopen and redetermine such claim in accordance with the
53 provisions of this article, provided that no such previously disallowed
54 claim for a qualifying condition shall be determined to have a date of
55 disablement that would bar the claim under section eighteen or section
56 twenty-eight of this chapter.
S. 8348 3

1 § 166. Liability of employer and insurance carrier. The employer in
2 whose employment an employee participated in World Trade Center rescue,
3 recovery and clean-up operations shall be liable for any claim for a
4 qualifying condition that is causally related to such participation
5 provided that such participation arose out of and in the course of such
6 employment. For the purpose of determining which carrier has insurance
7 coverage of such claim, the date of accident shall be considered the
8 last day of such participation.
9 § 167. Claims of volunteers. For persons who participated in World
10 Trade Center rescue, recovery and clean-up operations as volunteers, the
11 uninsured employers' fund shall be deemed to be the employer only for
12 the purposes of administering and paying claims pursuant to this arti-
13 cle. Benefits under this chapter shall be payable to such volunteers
14 only to the extent that funds are available out of funds appropriated to
15 the United States Department of Labor under Public Law 109-148 to reim-
16 burse the uninsured employer's fund for the payment of such benefits.
17 § 2. This act shall take effect immediately and shall be deemed to
18 have been in full force and effect on and after September 11, 2001 and
19 shall apply to all open and closed claims coming within its purview.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NEW YORK STATE SENATE
INTRODUCER'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT
submitted in accordance with Senate Rule VI. Sec 1



BILL NUMBER: S8348

SPONSOR: MARCHI

TITLE OF BILL:
An act to amend the workers' compensation law, in relation to claims for
illnesses sustained by workers who participated in the rescue, recovery
and clean-up effort following the terrorist attack at the World Trade
Center on September 11, 2001


PURPOSE OF THE BILL:
The purpose of this bill is overcome obstacles of filing claims by
participants in World Trade Center rescue, recovery and clean-up oper-
ations following the September 11, 2001 attacks for latent conditions
and illnesses by treating such claims filings in a similar manner to
claims for occupational disease. The bill also addresses specific issues
regarding claims of those who participated as employees and those that
participated as volunteers.


SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:

Section 1 of the bill adds a new article 8-a to the Workers' Compen-
sation Law ("WCL") which provides as follows:

* Section 161 provides definitions of "Participant in World Trade Center
rescue, recovery and cleanup operations", "World Trade Center site",
"Qualifying condition" and "Disablement" as those terms are used in the
new article. "Qualifying condition" is defined as a latent disease or
condition resulting from a hazardous exposure during participation in
the rescue, recovery or clean-up operation. "Disablement" is defined to
have the same meaning as the term is used in the WCL in reference to an
occupational disease.

* Section 162 requires participants, in order to qualify for special
notice and claims filing provisions for a qualifying condition, to file
a written and sworn statement with the Workers' Compensation Board (WCB)
within eighteen months of the effective date of the legislation stating
the dates that person worked in the operation and name of the employer.
The employer and carrier are to receive a copy.
* Section 163 provides that notice of injury or death from a qualifying
condition shall be given within two years after the disablement of the
participant or after the participant knew or should have known that the
qualifying condition was causally related to participation in rescue,
recovery or clean-up operations, whichever is later.
* Section 164 provides that the date of disablement for a claim by a
participant for a qualifying condition shall be treated as the occur-
rence of an accident so as to provide a statute of limitations standard
to these claims the same as that which applies to an occupational
disease claim.
* Section 165 provides that upon receiving a duly filed registration
statement for a qualifying condition, the WCB shall reopen any previous
claim for such a condition disallowed under WCL § 18 or § 28 and rede-
termine the claim applying the liberal notice and claims filing
provisions as provided.
* Section 166 provides that the employer of any participant in rescue,
recovery and clean-up operations shall be liable for any claim for a
qualifying condition that arose out of and in the course of employment
and that the insurance carrier covering the employer on the last day of
participation in rescue, recovery and clean-up operations has coverage
of such claims.
* Section 167 provides that the Uninsured Employers' Fund shall adminis-
ter and pay the claims of those who participated as volunteers but that
benefits shall be paid only to the extent that funds appropriated by the
federal government for such purpose are available.
Section 2 of the bill provides for an immediate effective date but is
deemed to have been in effect on and after September 11, 2001 and
applies to all open and closed claims coming within its purview.

EXISTING LAW:
Existing law treats claims for latent conditions resulting form a
hazardous exposure during participation in the rescue, recovery or
clean-up operation as accidents.

PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:
None.

STATEMENT IN SUPPORT:
The aim of this bill is to remove statutory obstacles to timely claims
filing and notice for latent conditions resulting from hazardous expo-
sure for those who worked in rescue, recovery or cleanup operations
following the World Trade Center September 11th, 2001 attack.
The WCL requires an employee to provide notice to the employer within 30
days (WCL § 18) and to file a claim for benefits within two years of the
injury (WCL § 28). Under the WCL, latent conditions are normally
compensable as occupational diseases. Notice and claims filing require-
ments are triggered by a date of disablement determined by the WCB.
Occupational disease claims usually involve conditions that develop
slowly over a period of years after an employee has performed a partic-
ular type of work. Each disease established by the WCL as occupational
is linked to particular work processes that the employee has performed
over time. In the case of participants in World Trade Center rescue,
recovery or cleanup operations, little is known about what diseases and
conditions might develop later on based on their exposure to uniquely
hazardous conditions so as to recognize them as occupational diseases.
This bill requires that claims for latent conditions alleged to be
causally related to a hazardous exposure while participating in rescue,
recovery or cleanup operations be treated for claims filing (statute of
limitations) and notice purposes in the same manner as an occupational
disease. Claims filing and notice provisions would begin to run from the
date of disablement determined by the WCB rather than from the date of
the actual exposure. As in occupational disease cases, the WCB has wide
latitude to set the date of disablement so that the claim of a partic-
ipant for a qualifying condition who discovered the presence or cause of
that condition at a date after participation ceased not to be barred by
the statute of limitations or for lack of timely notice. In cases where
the participant continues to work after seeking medical treatment for
the qualifying condition, the WCB would have latitude to set a date of
disablement so as to include such treatment as covered under the claim.
Claims for a qualifying condition can be determined to be compensable as
accidents under the WCL based on evidence that they are causally related
to a hazardous exposure during rescue, recovery or cleanup operations.
These complicated and unique issues of causation can best be addressed
by the WCB on a case by case basis.
To be eligible for occupational disease claims filing and notice treat-
ment, participants would be required to register with the WCB within
eighteen months after enactment of the legislation showing the dates and
location of their participation.
The bill also addresses claims handling and liability issues for two
distinct classes of workers who participated in the World Trade Center
rescue, recovery and cleanup effort, those who participated at the
behest of their employer and sustained injuries that arise out of and in
the course of that employment and those that participated as volunteers.
The employees are covered by their employers' workers' compensation
insurance. The bill provides that benefits for latent diseases will be
covered under the insurance policy covering the employer in question for
injuries sustained in the rescue, recovery and cleanup effort on the
date that the employee ended his or her participation in such oper-
ations.
Volunteers have been paid workers' compensation benefits for all inju-
ries related to participation in rescue, recovery and clean-up oper-
ations by the Uninsured Employers' Fund and reimbursed through the U.S.
Department of Labor out of a $50 million federal appropriation for that
purpose. The bill would clarify that benefits to these volunteers would
be financed only out of federal funds reimbursements appropriated for
that purpose and not otherwise be a liability imposed on the Uninsured
Employers' Fund.

BUDGET IMPLICATIONS:
None.

EFFECTIVE DATE:
This bill is effective immediately is deemed to have been in effect on
and after September 11, 2001 and applies to all open and closed claims
coming within its purview.

9/11 New York Workers' Compensation Bill Gaining Traction in Albany

It looks like a version of the new 9/11 Workers' Comp Bill introduced recently by Assemblyman Jonathan L. Bing (D-Manhattan) will soon become law.  Final details of a compromise 9/11 bill are currently being worked out by negotiators from Governor Pataki's office, the Assembly and the Senate, where a similar bill was introduced by State Senator John Marchi (R-Staten Island).   The New York Workers' Compensation Alliance has been working closely with all interested parties in Albany to craft a law that will protect all 9/11 heroes. If such a bill is signed by Governor Pataki, Ground Zero rescue, recovery and clean up workers will be given significant new protections that have hindered their workers' compensation claims to date

One of the main problems 9/11 workers have faced at the New York Workers' Compensation Board is having their claims denied for late filing.  In New York, an injured worker has two years from the "date of accident" (9/11/01) to file a claim for benefits.  Under the current law, that would make the cut off deadline for filing 9/11 claims September 11, 2003.  But what about the clean up worker  who breathed in numerous toxins at Ground Zero but doesn't begin to experience respiratory symptoms until sometime in 2004?  He is eventually diagnosed with lung cancer related to Ground Zero.  Currently, this claim would be denied by the Workers' Compensation Board as untimely.

Specifically, the new bill would fix this problem by removing the current "Statute of Limitations" (filing deadline) that has led to mass denials of 9/11 workers' comp claims.  It would apply the deadline normally reserved for Occupational Diseases such as mesothelioma or carpal tunnel syndrome (generally two years from the "date of disablement") . Hopefully, the new law will also allow all prior 9/11 claims denied or not filed due to deadline problems to be reopened or newly filed. 

The New York Legislature and the Governor are on a roll lately!  Timely budgets, more school aid, and now a much needed workers' compensation bill to protect the health and economic security of 9/11 heroesWe are truly living up to our nickname, the "Empire State"!

 

Workers' Compensation Senate Roundtable Report

Workers' Comp Alliance Co-Chairs John Sciortino and Troy Rosasco recently advocated the position of injured workers at a well attended public Roundtable in Albany sponsored by State Senator George Maziarz. Once again, Senator Maziarz proved to be an open minded fact finder seeking common ground solutions to the tough problem of Workers' Compensation.

As stated in a previous Workers' Compensation Alliance post, the panel consisted of representatives of injured workers and business. Joel Shufro, President of the New York Committee for Occupational Safety & Health (NYCOSH) made an impassioned plea to make safety on the job the number one priority. All panelists agreed this was a priority.

John Sciortino outlined the Workers' Compensation Alliance position on not capping benefits for permanent partial disabilities (PPD's) and raising the maximum benefit rate for the first time in 14 years. The business representatives continued to bang the drum that New York should cap PPD's "because 42 other states do". However, Troy Rosasco rebutted this reasoning as silly and unpersuasive. He compared such reasoning to the teenage daughter who pleas with her parents to allow her to go on an overnight ski trip "because 42 other parents do". Perhaps the other 8 states (parents) have it right! In addition, he noted that there are no university based research studies showing that workers comp costs put New York business at a competitive disadvantage. Finally, the business panel had to concede that the manufacturing economy in New York is the best it has been in over 5 years.

All in all, it was another excellent opportunity for the Workers' Compensation Alliance to speak for injured workers across New York State.

Attorney Rosasco Travels to Albany to Advocate for Workers' Compensation Alliance

I will be travelling to Albany tomorrow with New York Workers’ Compensation Alliance Legislative Co-Chair John Sciortino to take part in the second of a series of Roundtable Discussions hosted by Senator George Maziarz, New York State Senate Labor Committee Chair, regarding Workers’ Compensation Reform. Since Workers’ Comp Reform was recently detached from the Governor’s budget bill, it appears that workers’ compensation reform will continue to be on the Albany radar screen for the rest of the year.

Also scheduled to participate in the Roundtable are: Randall Wolken, President, Central New York Manufacturing Association; Cecelia Norat, Director of State Operations for AIG; William Melchionni, Nationwide Insurance; Mark Alesse, New York State Director, National Federation of Independent Business; and Ted Potrikus, Executive Vice President, Retail Council of New York State; and our friend and advocate for injured workers, Joel Shufro, President of NYCOSH. Members of the Senate Labor Committee are also expected to be in attendance.

Of course, the Workers’ Compensation Alliance will be advocating for a long overdue benefit increase, no caps on PPD’s (permanent partial disabilities), and expediting needed medical care for injured workers. Yet we will also be proposing a fair pharmacy benefit schedule that should save employers significant amounts of money by mandatory use of generic drugs. Surrounded by all these insurance and employer lobbyists, it looks like John and I will have our work cut out for us!

Rosasco Response to Newsday Editorial on Workers' Comp Reform

To the Editor:

I know Newsday is one of Long Island's major employers (owned by the Times-Tribune conglomerate), but I never thought its own corporate self interest would would infect its positions on the editorial page. On the issue of workers' compensation, apparently it did (Workers' Comp Reform, 3/21/06).

How soon Newsday forgets. 9/11 was the worst workplace tragedy in the history of the United States. Besides the over 3000 deaths, many Long Islanders suffered devastating permanent partial disabilities and will never return to any gainful occupation. The survivors and their families on Long Island live with this cruel reminder every day. Without the notoriety of 9/11, similar crippling permanent partial disabilities occur each and every day to workers on Long Island. Newsday notes that these serious injuries only make up 11% of those receiving benefits, but make up 72% of the cost. Isn't this the way it should be - with the most seriously disabled receiving the majority of workers compensation benefits? Newsday's logic on this issue eludes me.

There are no research studies showing that New York's workers' compensation costs cause New York to be less competitive than other states. In fact, all leading economic indicators point to a strong economy and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York recently published a report showing that manufacturing is particularly strong in New York. The fact that a number of other states have a different approach is not a persuasive argument to change New York's Workers' Compensation Law. Perhaps New York, like it is in so many other ways, is ahead of the rest of nation on this issue.

On March 25, 1911, 146 immigrant workers lost their lives due to unsafe workplace conditions in the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire in lower Manhattan. This tragedy was directly responsible for the groundbreaking enactment of the New York State Workers' Compensation Law. On the eve of the Triangle Fire's anniversary, it is disappointing that Newsday would take a stance hurting injured workers even further on its editorial page.

Troy G. Rosasco
Co-Chair
New York Workers' Compensation Alliance

NY Disability Attorney Travels to Albany for Senate Workers' Compensation Reform Hearings

I will be traveling to the State Capitol tomorrow, with fellow New York Workers’ Compensation Alliance Board member Barbara Levine, to attend the Senate Workers’ Compensation Reform hearings called by Upstate Senator George Maziarz. Although the scheduled speakers are heavily stacked in favor of the insurance industry and employer interests, AFL-CIO President Denis Hughes will be speaking on behalf of all injured working men and women across New York State. Of course, the Workers’ Compensation Alliance will be out in full force making sure the Senate Labor Committee is aware of our opposition to the Pataki "Deform" bill.

I had the pleasure of sitting down last week with Senate Labor Committee member John Flanagan (R-Northport) in his district office in Smithtown. Senator Flanagan is certainly one of the Legislature’s rising stars, and we spoke for a considerable time about how the Pataki bill would hurt permanently disabled 9/11 victims. In fact, all the Long Island State Senators, including Dean Skelos, Mike Balboni, Chuck Fuschillo and Carl Marcellino, know first hand the devastating and ongoing impact of 9/11 claims in the workers’ compensation system.

Unlike some upstate Senators, they probably personally know workers who are just now coming down with cancer and lung diseases related to working at Ground Zero. In addition, each has a strong tradition of supporting working people. In fact, many were in attendance last Friday night at a Nassau Republican gala in Woodbury in which union leaders Auggie Buckhardt and Bill Flanagan were honored. I am confident that they will not cap permanent disability benefits for injured workers. I look forward to seeing them in Albany. A full report on the Senate workers’ compensation hearings will follow shortly.

NY Workers' Comp Lawyer Lectures on Balbuena

I had the pleasure of lecturing at St. John's Law School last Friday in Professor Dave Gregory's Employment Law class. Besides the general overview that I usually do on the workers' compensation law, I specifically focused on the recent NY Court of Appeals split decision in Balbuena which was announced on February 21, 2006.

In my mind, Balbuena is the most important labor decision which will come down from the Court this year. It may in fact be the most important of all the Court's decisions this year. Essentially, the Court held that a worker's status as an illegal immigrant did not prevent him from receiving benefits for lost wages in a personal injury law suit. Had this case gone the other way, which it did in one appellate court below, I can guarantee you that workers' comp insurance carriers would have used it to deny workers' comp to undocumented residents before the ink was dry.

Putting aside the technical legal premise upon which the majority opinion rests ( the federal Immigration Reform and Control Act does not preempt NY occupational safety laws), the macro economic issue the Court wrestled with was really how our country deals with illegal immigration juxtaposed against our need for workers who will do jobs that many Americans refuse to do. This case embodies the issues that President Bush is trying to remedy with his current "guest worker" proposal. The majority opinion is scholarly and a must read for any attorney interested in worker rights. As a result of this win for injured workers, employers will be unable to further exploit undocumented workers. Their jobs are already dangerous enough.

Unfortunately, the dissent by Judges Read and Smith was not nearly as persuasive. It focused on why the Court should not sanction "illegal contracts". Where's Scalia when you need him? But then again, some legal experts are predicting that this case might go all the way to the US Supreme Court, so good old Antonin may get his shot yet.

NY Workers' Comp Alliance Position Paper 2006

NY WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ALLIANCE (WCA)

Position On Governor Pataki's Proposed Changes To
The Workers’ Compensation System
Budget Bill Article VII A.9561/S.6461

The New York workers’ compensation system is in need of changes to keep pace with the cost of living and to effectively deliver the basic medical benefits promised to injured workers by the State Constitution. In recent years it has become commonplace to accuse the current workers’ compensation system of providing too little in the way of benefits to injured workers while costing employers too much. Both of these criticisms are well founded. Unfortunately the legislation currently proposed by Governor Pataki will not provide the promised relief either to injured workers or to business.

The Governor's proposal is INADEQUATE. It provides too little in benefit increases to injured workers and contains no guarantees that it can deliver relief from the high cost of workers’
compensation insurance.

The Governor's proposal is INSENSITIVE to the real needs of injured workers and to the plight of small businesses in New York.

The Workers’ Compensation Alliance (WCA) is made up of legal professionals with extensive background working within the New York workers’ compensation system. We are comprised of over thirty law firms and corporations throughout the State that represent and provide service to injured workers We believe the workers’ compensation system can be successfully modified to
meet the needs of New York's injured workers and at the same time deliver cost savings to New York business.

?ň The WCA strongly favors a genuine benefit increase to injured workers. The WCA strongly opposes any attempt to reduce current benefits to injured workers by limiting the
scope of permanent disability benefits
.

?ň The WCA strongly favors changes in the way medical benefits are delivered injured workers that will also yield significant cost savings to employers. The WCA believes
that real cost savings are possible but that they should not be found at the expense of the injured workers the statute has always served.

?ň The WCA strongly favors the absolute right of the injured worker to have his or her day in Court before a Judge. The WCA thus strongly opposes efforts to erode the due process guaranteed in the statute.

This paper will explore each of these areas in some detail. We will show (1) why a benefit
increase is needed and what would be necessary to provide genuine economic relief to injured workers. We will show (2) why cost savings should not be achieved by reducing basic economic benefits to injured workers, but should be focused on control of the real cost drivers of the system. Finally,we will show (3) why it's important not to take away the injured workers’ due process right to a hearing before a Judge, currently guaranteed in the State Constitution.

Why the Governor’s Benefit Increase is Inadequate

In his proposal Governor Pataki seeks to raise the maximum rate of workers' compensation benefits from the current $400 per week to $500 per week by increasing the maximum rate by $25 per year between now and January 1, 2009. The Governor's proposal is both misleading and inadequate. It will actually leave injured workers in a position worse than they were on July
1, 1992 when the last increase in the workers’ compensation maximum took effect.

Currently,the maximum workers’ compensation rate in Connecticut is $931 per week and in New Jersey is $891 per week. Injured New York workers deserve benefits that will not force them into poverty.
A maximum rate of $500 in 2009, when adjusted to 1992 dollars will be significantly below what is necessary for the workers' compensation rates to keep pace with increases in the Consumer
Price Index (CPI). As computed by the Federal Reserve Bank, in order for the maximum compensation rate in 2004 to have the same purchasing power as it had in 1992 the rate should already have been raised to $538.56. The proposed maximum rate that would not become
effective until 2009 is only 92.8% of what the rate should have been in 2004 to keep pace with inflation. As prices continue to rise between now and 2009 the Governor's proposed rate increase will represent less and less real purchasing power to injured workers.

Any real increase in workers’ compensation maximum benefits should be tied to the state average weekly wage. Workers’ compensation lost wage benefits are calculated as a percentage of average weekly wage. From the beginning of the New York workers’
compensation system in 1914 it has been widely acknowledged that workers’ compensation benefits should equal two-thirds of a person's actual average weekly wage. The last benefit
increase in 1992 was calculated to achieve this goal
. Any current modification of the workers’ compensation maximum rate should do the same. According to the New York State Department of Labor, in 1992 the state average weekly wage was $623.22. This meant that in 1992 the maximum workers’ compensation rate was approximately 64.2% of the state average weekly wage. By 2004 the state average weekly wage had increased to $960.64 leaving the maximum workers' compensation rate of $400 to represent only about 41.6% of the state average weekly wage. To keep pace with the increase in the state average weekly wage the rate in 2004 should have been increased to $616.57. If the governor’s proposal is enacted by 2009 the maximum workers' compensation rate of $500
will be only about 52% of the 2004 state average weekly wage.

The Governor cynically claims that his proposal constitutes a 25% increase in the maximum workers' compensation rates. In
fact, under his proposal the injured workers of New York State will be worse off in real dollars in 2009 than they were in 1992.
It has been 16 years since the Legislature addressed the question of the maximum benefit in workers’ compensation. In the last 12 years achieving an increase of the maximum benefit has been a stumbling block for other real reforms in the workers’ compensation system. The only way to avoid this type of deadlock in the future is to permanently tie the maximum workers’
compensation benefit directly to the state average weekly wage
.

For this reason the Workers’ Compensation Alliance asks the Legislature to consider permanently linking the maximum benefit level for workers’ compensation to two thirds of the state average weekly wage as computed by the New York State Labor Department.


Why basic economic benefits to injured workers should not be reduced

The most objectionable aspect of the Governor's proposal is the drastic reductions in benefits paid to permanently disabled injured workers. Under the Governor's proposal persons who have become permanently disabled due to a workplace injury would be completely cut off from wage loss benefits after a given number of years.

The Governor's proposal offers no alternative source of benefits to permanently disabled injured workers. It offers no help in rehabilitating permanently disabled injured workers. It simply tells injured workers who have lost their livelihood that they are out of luck. After the prescribed period of benefits, the economic security of the injured worker will become the responsibility of county and local government
welfare systems
.

The apparent rationale for these proposed cuts to wage loss benefits is that paying benefits to persons who have a permanent disability is expensive. There is no doubt that such payments are expensive, but it is also the right thing to do. The Workers’ Compensation Law in New York has historically promised workers who have been severely and permanently injured they will not
die in poverty
. The Governor's proposal is nothing short of a cruel abandonment of the most seriously injured.

To understand how the Governor's proposal would affect permanently disabled workers consider the case of Mark, a 35-year-old pipe fitter. Mark was working at a high wage construction job making more than $1200 a week when a hose from a compressor broke loose and struck him in the back of the head. Mark suffered a severe traumatic brain injury. Even
after the best medical treatment available Mark will never be able to return to work
. Indeed, Mark has been granted Social Security disability benefits because the federal government has
decided that he's unemployable. Under the current wage loss limits in the Workers’ Compensation Law Mark receives $400 a week, the maximum possible. He has lost his home, his vehicle and his marriage. He had to declare bankruptcy. Once he started receiving Social Security disability benefits he was able to begin rebuilding his life because when combined with his continuing workers’ compensation benefits he could now afford a basic standard of living. If he loses his weekly workers’ compensation benefit, even the most basic lifestyle will be
unaffordable.

Or consider the case of Anne, a 45-year-old Emergency Medical Technician who worked at Ground Zero for three months after 9/11. Anne was earning more than $1000 a week and was a member of the EMT union. She was a "first responder" and is considered a hero by all accounts. In 2003, Anne developed a persistent cough that would not go away. She sought treatment from pulmonary specialists who informed her that she has Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease as a result of the toxins she inhaled at Ground Zero. Anne was prescribed multiple medications and tried to continue to work. However, as her disease progressed, and given the physical nature of the job, she soon had to stop working as an EMT permanently. If
she ever works again it will be for much less of a wage that she made as an EMT. Anne needs the permanent reduced earnings benefits provided by Workers’ Compensation to survive.

Under the Governor's proposal Mark’s and Anne’s benefits would be ended after somewhere between 5 and 10 years of payments. The Governor's proposal would simply take away
necessary income replacement benefits from these permanently disabled workers. This loss of benefits will render these permanently disabled workers poverty-stricken and require them to
seek assistance from the welfare system. How fair is that to these seriously injured workers?
How fair is the cost shifting to the average taxpayer?

Until and unless some solution is proposed that would guarantee the economic security of permanently injured workers, they should not be asked to fund insurance company profits or to
make an enormous sacrifice so that workers’ compensation insurance can be slightly more affordable.

While there is no question that workers’ compensation insurance needs to be made more affordable in New York, it is simply not right to ask the most seriously injured workers to be the
source of lower insurance premiums
. The Legislature should seriously investigate other ways to lower premium costs. Some such ways are proposed in the Governor's legislation. The WCA
supports the proposed measures to lower medical costs by imposing new fee schedules and by reducing the amount of time it takes to get approval for medical services
. The WCA also supports increasing innovative occupational safety programs and tax incentives for the safest employers. Surely there are more innovative ways to reduce the cost of workers’ compensation
insurance that do not demand the impoverishment of hard working New Yorkers who have had the unfortunate luck to be injured on the job.

Why the due process right to a hearing should not be reduced

Given the urgency and gravity of the lost wage and medical concerns that face a worker who is injured on-the-job, injured workers and those who employ them are currently guaranteed an
adjudicatory hearing
, held at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner. Section 20(1) of the Workers’ Compensation Law provides that a hearing "shall" be ordered "upon application of
either party."

The Governor’s proposal would eliminate this absolute right to a hearing by amending §20 of the Workers’ Compensation Law to allow for the scheduling of a hearing before an administrative law judge only after it is determined that the dispute cannot be resolved by undergoing non-binding "conciliation" procedures. This proposal is inconsistent with the due
process rights of both injured workers and employers. Not only does the governor’s proposal eliminate a fundamental right of the parties in workers’ compensation litigation, it does so for no real reason. This change will not result in any savings and will only prolong the time needed to resolve central issues; not a good bargain.

Not only does this proposal violate fundamental due process rights but it proposes to require use of a system of non-binding conciliation meetings that has already shown itself to be a failure
in resolving the common controversies that exist in many workers’ compensation cases. The conciliation process was instituted as part of the reforms of 1996. Since that time experience with the conciliation process shows it is inappropriate for resolving any true controversy. In fact, the Workers’ Compensation Board currently uses the conciliation process only after the Board itself has determined that no true controversy exists. For this reason any statistics about the so called success of the conciliation process are deeply misleading. In fact, each and every time the conciliation process has been applied when a true controversy exists it has failed.

There's no doubt that there is a place in the workers’ compensation system for the conciliation process. Conciliation can be used effectively where the parties are in fundamental agreement.
However, is not uncommon that diametrically opposed positions that are not susceptible to negotiation and compromise are raised on fundamental issues in a case. To require that such fundamental disputes first undergo non-binding "conciliation" before being allowed an adjudicatory hearing imposes on the injured worker the burden of undergoing a wasteful and time-consuming layer of proceedings before any real opportunity for relief can be reached.

Take the common example of a construction worker who falls on-the-job and injures his shoulder. Because the treating physician believes the injury to be a rotator cuff tear, the
diagnostic test typically ordered is an MRI. If the MRI is positive, the injured worker will undergo surgery; a negative test means a course of intensive physical therapy. Any delay in diagnosis
risks a frozen shoulder.

If the MRI is granted shortly after the injury, the recovery time is usually six weeks or less. If the carrier refuses to authorize the MRI, the injured worker’s only practical recourse is to request an adjudicatory hearing. The precious time spent first attempting to
"conciliate" the matter will cost the claimant at least a four-month delay in being allowed the only practical opportunity he has to achieve a successful resolution of the dispute at an evidentiary
hearing. Unfortunately, during all of this time, the injured construction worker will have had little or no use of his painful arm, will be out of work and suffer a dramatic reduction in his wages, and ultimately have a diminished opportunity to completely heal. This unfortunate scenario will be played out time and again if the Governor’s proposal is passed into law.

The fundamental requisite of procedural due process is the opportunity to be heard, by way of a hearing provided at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner. There are few instances where the urgency to obtain relief is as profound as in a Workers’ Compensation case. Unimpeded access to an adjudicatory hearing is the only effective means available to an injured
worker to obtain the lost wage and medical benefits that are so desperately needed.

Detailed analysis of the proposal

For the above reasons, the WCA takes the following positions on the Governor’s proposed Article VII legislation, A.9561 and S. 6461, to amend the Workers’ Compensation system:

The WCA FAVORS:

1. An increase in the maximum weekly benefit, and believes that benefits should be permanently set at two thirds of the state average weekly wage. We also support the
proposed increase in the disability insurance benefit level.

2. Cost savings that can be generated by the imposition of a fee schedule for medication as well as other medical services and the development of networks of providers so long as the injured worker continues to have the right to free choice of medical providers .

3. A raise in the prior authorization limit to $1000 thereby reducing the time needed to obtain necessary medical tests and treatment .

4. A reduction from 60 to 45 days for the Board to schedule a preliminary hearing in a controverted case.

5. The revision of the Workers’ Compensation Board Medical Guidelines by a panel of medical experts working in consultation with legal practitioners .

THE WCA OPPOSES:

1. An inadequate increase in the maximum lost wage benefit.

2. A cap on benefits for those permanently disabled.

3. The elimination of the right to a hearing to resolve controversies.

4. The development of a pilot program for voluntary delivery of benefits outside of the Workers’ Compensation Board.

5. Development of networks of medical providers controlled by insurance companies without right to free choice of providers by injured workers.

6. Elimination of the stenographic recording for evidence in workers’ compensation matters.

THE WCA takes no position on the other provisions in the Governor's proposal.

For further information please contact:

Richard D. Winsten, Esq.
Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, PC

One Commerce Plaza, Suite 1102
Albany, New York 12260
Phone: (518) 465-5551

Troy Rosasco Esq., Co-Chair Legislative Committee
Turley, Redmond, and Rosasco LLP

3075 Veterans Memorial Highway
Ronkonkoma, NY 11779
Phone: (631) 582-3700 ext. 123

John Sciortino, Esq., Co-Chair Legislative Committee
Segar & Sciortino, LLP

400 Meridian Centre ¬? Suite 320
Rochester, NY 14618
Phone: (585) 475-1100

New York Workers' Compensation Alliance Exposes "Comp Watch '06

Just read the New York Workers' Compensation Alliance's take on "Comp Watch '06", the newsletter put out by the New York State Business Council. It's called "Comp Truth '06", and is really a far more even handed presentation of the facts. It is must reading for all New York State Legislators considering workers' comp "reform" in New York State this year..

Bottom Line - injured public employees who are collecting workers' comp and a pension from New York State are not "double dipping", as implied by the Business Council. These systems are coordinated to prevent just that. For instance, those employees in Tier I who receive an "Accidental Disability Pension" have their pensions reduced "dollar for dollar" for any workers' comp they might receive. How is that double dipping? Anyway, it's good for New York State State Legislators to hear both sides of the argument, especially in an election year!

NY Workers' Compensation Alliance Launches Website

The New York State Workers' Compensation Alliance has just launched its new website. As most of you know, the NY Workers' Compensation Alliance is a group of individuals and organizations dedicated to protecting the rights and benefits of injured workers.

In the still embering flames of 9/11, Governor Pataki has proposed a new workers' compensation "reform" bill (I call it a "deform" bill), heavily supported by insurance companies, that would take away benefits from the most seriously injured - including 9/11 survivors.

My firm is still representing many seriously hurt 9/11 victims in their workers' compensation claims. We, along with most of my colleagues in the Workers' Compensation Bar, previously represented the families of deceased 9/11 victims on a "pro bono" basis and the vast majority of all death claims are now thankfully resolved.

However, each day another worker in the Ground Zero envelope develops another serious lung condition and or cancer. Workers' Compensation insurance companies are fighting these claims tooth and nail. I am sure my office will be litigating these career ending - and sometimes deadly claims long after my young children are grown. The cancers may not develop for 20-30 years. We will just have to wait, see and pray for the best.

That's what burns me most about the Governor's workers' comp bill. 9/11 survivors would lose benefits under this bill. That's where the New York Workers' Compensation Alliance comes in. As a member of the Alliance, Turley, Redmond & Rosasco pledges to help defeat this bill in Albany. However, the NY Workers' Compensation Alliance needs your help. If you don't believe 9/11 survivors should lose their workers' comp benefits, please call your State Senator toll free at 1-877-255-9417 and press "2". If you don't know the name of your State Senator, simply give them your zip code and the operator will connect you directly to your Senator's office. Tell the Senator you oppose Governor Pataki's workers' compensation bill since it will take away benefits from the most seriously injured.

Because the workers' comp bill is attached to the State Budget, it should be resolved by April 1st. Time is short - call today to voice your opinion. Thank you in advance for helping to protect injured workers.

9/11 First Responders Hurt by Pataki Workers Comp Bill

Gov. Pataki's new workers' compensation "reform" bill will be a disaster for the heroes of 9/11 - the "first responders". As recently detailed in an excellent Newsday article, first responders are getting sicker every day, and many are now dying from their exposure to toxins at Ground Zero.

As I have stated before, the Pataki workers comp bill takes away benefits from the most seriously disabled by capping how long they can receive benefits. Chronically ill first responders - the ones who will never recover - will then be forced into the welfare system. How fair is that?

A good friend of mine (age 36) worked at Ground Zero for over two months looking for the remains of his firefighter brother. Now he has Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (COPD). MRI tests show potential pre-cancerous lesions on his lungs. He can barely mow his lawn, much less jump and run with his two great kids.

Did Governor Pataki think about the impact of losing workers comp benefits on first responders before proposing this ill advised legislation? I doubt it. Those who know him personally speak of a genuinely good man. I think he, along with Rudy Giuliani, did a fantastic job after 9/11 and this blog has applauded him when he signed excellent pension protections for 9/11 first responders. Perhaps he is just getting some bad advice from those pushing him to run for President.

Thanks to our good friends at the Workers' Comp Insider for pointing us to the excellent Newsday article.

Gov. Pataki's "Deform" Workers' Compensation Bill Language

Click here to read this mean spirited pablum. As usual, the "devil is in the details" when it comes to New York workers' compensation benefits. I'll have a more detailed analysis of this flawed workers comp bill forthcoming soon. Until then, if you're an injured worker or property taxpayer (Yes - the Governor's workers comp plan shifts costs to you!), read it and weep.

I really wish the President (oops - Governor!) would simply move to Iowa already since he won't be around to see his own New York State citizens suffer under this silly proposal. Why doesn't he just make it part of his Presidential platform to "reform" workers comp across the country? He'll certainly carry states like Texas and Mississippi. It wasn't so long ago that states like those didn't give workers lunch breaks!

NY Workers' Compensation "Reform" Agenda Heating Up in 2006

2006 may be shaping up as a year for significant workers' compensation reform in New York. Yesterday, Governor Pataki introduced his Workers' Compensation Reform "Budget" Proposal. This is essentially the same bill as his anti-worker Workers' Compensation Program bill put out last October, and which we previously denounced here. The difference, however, is that now the Governor's Workers Comp bill is linked to passing the New York State budget, a strategy he used somewhat effectively during the 1996 workers' comp reform negotiations.

Of course, the word "reform" means different things depending upon who you are talking to. To injured workers, the New York State AFL-CIO, and workers' compensation attorneys, reform means increasing the benefit levels which have been frozen during Pataki "Ice Age". To the New York State Business Council and their cohorts, it means taking away benefits from the most seriously injured workers. Their ilk even have a slick new website at "www.fixworkerscomp.com" (I won't dignify them with a free link, so you'll have to cut and paste their address into your browser if you really want to read their propaganda) Bottom Line - if workers get the raise in benefit levels they have been denied these past 13 long years, the New York (Anti) Workers' Compensation Action Network (a/k/a the New York Business Council or cohorts) wants to pay for it by cutting benefits to the most seriously injured - those with permanent, career ending disabilities.

Now, Republican New York State Senator George Maziarz, Chair of the State Labor Committee, has announced a public hearing on Workers Compensation Reform for Monday, March 13, 2006 in Albany. In his press release, the Senator blames state job losses on the cost of workers' compensation. Like so many politicians, he fails to site any empirical data or studies supporting his wrong headed hypothesis that jobs are leaving New York due to workers' comp costs. The Governor used the same ploy when he announced his workers comp program bill last year. He blamed the Delphi bankruptcy on workers' comp costs, and was taken to task here and in other forums when Delphi's real problems were shown to be more like an "Enron type" scandal. Senator Maziarz says: "its time to strike a new balance and save jobs". I say: "its time to strike a fair balance and save homes". As the son of hard working union members, I think the Senator knows who to stick up for in this fight. How many disabled workers have lost their homes over the last 13 years while waiting for a paltry benefit increase? (they haven't even gotten a cost of living increase!). All while the workers' compensation insurance companies are cheating the system and the Delphi executives are making millions. How fair is that? Want to save jobs? Stop the culture of corporate greed so that workers are treated with dignity again - not like surplus parts on the factory floor. After all, it is these workers who will be voting this November! ( as so adroitly pointed out recently at a forum of the Republican Long Island State Senators).

Perhaps a bipartisan hearing, including Democrat Susan John, Chair of the State Assembly Labor Committee, and Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, might be more constructive. Otherwise, this is all grandstanding and pandering to corporate special interests. After all, we all know that nothing will happen without some type of bipartisan agreement. If we can get Governor Pataki to focus more on disabled New Yorkers than on Iowa delegates, we might have a chance of seeing the long overdue benefit increase for injured workers in 2006. We might then be proud of our politicians in Albany. Who's taking bets?

The Workplace Project Honors Workers' Compensation Attorneys Turley, Redmond & Rosasco

The Workplace Project, the trail blazing immigrant rights organization on Long Island, will be honoring Turley, Redmond & Rosasco, LLP at it's 13th Anniversary Gala on Wednesday, November 9, 2005 at the Fox Hollow Inn.

The attorneys at Turley, Redmond & Rosasco have worked cooperatively with the Workplace Project for over 10 years to improve working conditions for Latino immigrants in New York. As detailed in Workplace Project founder Jennifer Gordon's recent book, Suburban Sweatshops, the New York economy thrives on the backs of immigrant workers who work in the type of deplorable working conditions not seen since the times of Dickens. It has been our honor to help these individuals receive workers' compensation benefits when they are seriously injured on the job. It is sad to report that the majority of workers' compensation death cases I see in my office today involve immigrant workers who are doing jobs that few American born workers would even consider. Far and away, it is these immigrant workers who come to my office in wheelchairs and missing limbs.

The Workplace Project serves a vital role in protecting the human dignity of immigrant workers in New York and Long Island. Many elected officials and friends of this fine organization will be on hand for this Gala on November 9th. Sponorships, journal ads and tickets are available by calling Executive Director Nadia Marin-Molina at (516) 565-5377. Many of the Turley, Redmond & Rosasco attorneys and staff will be present along with frinds of our law firm. Please join us on November 9th to support The Workplace Project. We look forward to seeing you there.

Workers Compensation Top Ten Tips - Tip #1

File a C-3 Form with the New York State Workers Compensation Board

I wish I had a dollar for every client who told me: "I already filed my claim", when in fact, the New York State Workers Compensation Board knows nothing about their injury. Many claimants mistakenly believe that their rights are protected simply by filling out an Accident Report (Form C-2...confusing, huh?) with the employer. Nothing could be further from the truth. Employers frequently bury Accident Reports or simply neglect to forward them to the insurance carrier and the Workers Compensation Board. Either way, it can severely delay your medical care and cash benefits. The only sure way to make sure that your claim is processed timely is to file a C-3 Form.

You can get a C-3 Form from either the New York State Workers Compensation Board or a workers compensation attorney. If your injury is serious (you are out of work more than two weeks and/or the injury may be permanent, you should consult a workers compensation lawyer before you fill out the form. Just like TV, "anything you say now may be used against you" at a later time, so better to be safe than sorry.

Once a C-3 is filed and a case indexed (you get an eight digit WCB case # in the mail) by the New York State Workers Compensation Board, the insurance carrier has strict time deadlines to answer your claim and start paying benefits if you are eligible. The C-3 form is the single most important form among the hundreds used at the New York State Workers Compensation Board. You will never get a tax refund if you don't file a tax return, right? The C-3 is just like a tax return - you need to file it to make sure you get all the compensation you deserve. File the C-3 as soon as possible after your accident, or you will be at the mercy of the insurance companies.

Next Week - How to Find a "Good" Workers Compensation Attorney

Workers Compensation and Disability Claims on Labor Day?

Unfortunately, according to a new CNN poll, 42% of workers will be will be laboring on Labor Day - a traditional day of rest. Its a sad commentary on our "Winner Takes All" economy when almost half of America can't enjoy a full day of rest. Except for the rescue workers in New Orleans dealing with Katrina, I think everyone deserves and needs a break on Labor Day. For those of you who have to work this Monday, at least be careful. I don't want to come into the office on Tuesday and have to file any new workers compensation claims for injuries on Labor Day. Have a great weekend!

Murder Charged in Queens Workers Compensation Death Claim

A Long Island man was charged with criminally negligent homicide last week for the death of a co-worker on a Queens construction site. Both men were employees of an electrical contractor in Forest Hills. According to the article in Newsday, the employee who died was on the forks of a forklift being driven by the employee now being charged with murder. The dead employee was hit by a piece of concrete in the chest. Police sources indicate that the employees may have been engaged in "horseplay". This was the second Queens workers compensation death claim in the past week.

Several points: 1) in the last year, forklift accidents have been on the rise in my office. Whether it is due to negligent operation or a manufacturing defect, these steel behemoths can be deadly. Be careful when you hear them beeping up the aisles at your local Home Depot!; 2) even when employees are engaged in "horseplay", they may still have viable workers compensation and Labor Law 200, 240 or 241 claims. New York State Labor Law allows the injured worker to sue the general contractor or owner of the property at a construction site. Based upon the facts presented in Newsday, I would investigate both the workers compensation and the Labor Law claims in this tragic accident; 3) Hats off to New York’s Finest, the NYPD, for charging this potential crime. Many jurisdictions would have chalked it up as only a tragic accident. Let’s hope Queens District Attorney Richard Brown takes workplace safety seriously and prosecutes the defendant to the full extent of the law. Accidents on New York City construction sites are a major problem. Prosecutions like this will go a long way to promoting safer working conditions on construction sites.

Long Island Press Workers Compensation Cover Story

High Costs, Low Benefits: Why New York State has the Worst Workers Compensation in the Nation" is the front page story in the July 14, 2005 edition of the Long Island Press. Accompanying the headline is a picture of an injured worker missing a leg. This is a timely and powerful article, and should be read by anyone who wants to know the inside scoop on how workers compensation insurance companies take advantage of BOTH workers and employers in New York State. One telling fact is the disclosure that workers compensation insurance companies in New York had a profit margin of almost 10% in 2003, and they now have the audacity to request a 16.1% premium increase this year. Bottom Line - its the workers compensation insurance companies who are killing employers and business in New York State.

This article comes on the heals of a heart breaking, yet inspiring, story in Newsday this week about a worker who had both hands amputated by a factory machine, only to have them reattached by some great surgeons at Stony Brook University Hospital. This father of 8 is now struggling to regain the use of his hands while trying to survive on meager New York State workers compensation payments, which have not been raised in 13 years. His caring employer stopped his health insurance for his 8 kids! It really puts a human face on major societal problem - treating injured workers like just another widget.

Workers Compensation for Victims of Highway Crash?

The fiery crash yesterday which killed three immigrant workers commuting in a dangerous 15 passenger van to a factory on Long Island raises interesting workers compensation legal issues. The workers who packed the van were from a Brooklyn Haitian community almost 50 miles away from bath products factory on Long Island. It is increasingly common for Long Island employers to recruit immigrant workers from the city and provide transportation. Employers simply can't find enough Long Islanders to do simple factory work at the low wages they are willing to pay. I have had cases involving Long Island employers importing workers from as far away as New Jersey.

This is where the workers compensation question comes in. Are the workers entitled to workers compensation for their injuries commuting to work? In this case, the answer could be YES. The general rule is that workers are not covered while going to or from work. However, there are exceptions. If the employee is being transported in the employer's vehicle for the benefit of the employer (i.e. to recruit and retain a stable workforce), then the workers are covered. Even if the employer in this case did not own the vehicle, but simply arranged for the transportation and subsidized the cost, the employer could be on the hook for workers compensation payments. All 15 passengers of the van suffered some injuries. As the investigation of this tragic crash unfolds, it will be interesting to find out who arranged for and paid for the workers' van service.

New York Workers Compensation Benefit Increase Bill Introduced

Here is a summary of the new Workers Compensation bill introduced on 6/9/05 in the State Assembly and supported by the New York State AFL-CIO. It provides a long overdue benefit increase for injured workers AND provides significant cost savings for employers. Sounds like a win/win to me!

Thanks to my partner Chris Redmond, the firm's WILG representative, for bringing to my attention the recent workers compensation benefit increase negotiated in Illinois. Chris just got back from the latest WILG Conference in Washington, DC where attorneys from others states were a lot less optimistic about real benefit increases for workers. Hopefully, New York will join Illinois and find common ground between workers and employers. I know my clients are dying economically at the current benefit level.

Workers Compensation Rating Board Asks for 16% Rate Increase

Are they nuts? No, just greedy! The Rating Board, which is controlled by workers compensation insurance company CEO's, waited until new Insurance Superintendent Howard Mills was confirmed before submitting their most recent money grab. Former Insurance Superintendent Gregory Serio correctly shot down their last outrageous request for a 29.5% increase, noting that industry profits were over 8% in 2004. Obviously, the insurance companies think they have a better shot with Mills.

The New York State Business Council should start protecting its employer members by fighting the real cause of increasing workers' compensation costs in New York State - the AIG's of the world! What employers really need is a Special Investigation Unit to uncover insurance company fraud!

Thanks to Matt Lerner for posting this important info on his excellent New York Civil Law blog. If you are interested in New York Labor Law 240 and workers compensation law, its a must read.

Injured Workers Bar Association Conference - 5/14/05

Heard a lot of potential good news at the Injured Workers Bar Association conference in Albany over the weekend. First, along with the New York State AFL-CIO, we will be pushing the legislature hard for a long overdue workers compensation rate increase. Its been thirteen (13) years since injured claimants had a raise in their workers compensation payments. During that same period, workers compensation insurance companies have been reaping record profits while cheating the Workers Compensation Board. When will business, represented by the New York State Business Council and the Central New York Manufacturers Association, learn that gouging insurance companies are their real enemies?

Assemblywoman Susan John (D-Rochester), Chair of the Assembly Labor Committee, gave a great presentation on the politics of a workers compensation rate increase. Injured workers throughout New York State are lucky to have Ms. John in their corner. In addition, Jonathan Rosen, an Industrial Hygienist with the Public Employees Federation (PEF), spoke on special workers compensation benefits for PEF members. He also highlighted the importance of New York's Occupational Health Clinics in New York City and Long Island. These clinics have specific expertise in the diagnosis and treatment of many occupational diseases and injuries. All injured and disabled workers should avail themselves of the resources.

Our next conference is scheduled for Buffalo in the early Fall. Then we'll probably return to the milder climate of New York City in the Winter. Hope to see you there.

Long Island Federation of Labor Dinner

Chris Redmond, Craig Rosasco and I had a great time at the Long Island Federation of Labor Dinner this past Monday. Honored for his long time commitment the labor movement was our friend, New York State Assemblyman Tom DiNapoli (Dem - Great Neck). Tom is one of the major players in Albany protecting workers compensation claimants. The son of a CWA union official and a former school board member like me, Tom gave a moving speech about labor’s crucial role in protecting the middle class. No wonder some are touting him as a possible Lt. Governor candidate in 2006.

We also broke bread with many union leader friends, including fellow Daler Nick Lamorte, President of the Long Island CSEA. Nick was a major supporter during my first successful Farmingdale School Board election. As Nick and I joked about old times, in walked Town of Oyster Bay Supervisor and friend John Venditto (Rep- North Massapequa), another Daler and friend of the working man - just ask Auggie Buckhardt of Local 881. Thankfully, Long Island Labor remains a strong and vital part of our local economy.

Working Mothers' Day

Turley, Redmond & Rosasco, LLP salutes all Moms this Mothers' Day! Their unselfish efforts, both in the workplace and home, are too often taken for granted. At 6:30 this morning, my six and seven year old kids announced that they were in the process of making Mommy pancakes and bacon. I knew our kitchen would look like Dresden after the war if I did not get out of bed to supervise. It took us 1 1/2 hours, but the final product wasn't half bad. This making breakfast for the whole family stuff isn't easy! I'm sure many of you had similar experiences, and I hope the Mom in your life had a restful day. She goes back to work tomorrow.

Tragic Day for Long Island Workers

Coming eerily on the heels of Workers Memorial Day on April 28th, three workers died on the job in Suffolk County on May 2, 2005. In the first accident, two ambulance workers were killed while transporting a heart attack victim to a hospital in Riverhead. In the second accident, a 22 year old man was crushed when a 1,000 pound piece of cement fell off a forklift in Bellport. Our firm has already been retained by the family of one of the victims to prosecute their workers compensation death claim.

Both accidents raise interesting legal issues regarding wage earning capacity. The ambulance worker claims are not literally workers compensation claims. Volunteer Ambulance Workers (as well as Volunteer Firefighters) are covered under separate and distinct laws that are administered by the New York Workers Compensation Board. These somewhat arcane laws can provide better benefits than the Workers Compensation Law itself since they look at the workers "earning capacity" as opposed to actual wages.

The death of the 22 year raises the issue of "wage expectancy". This legal concept, a product of trade union apprentice programs, allows the Workers Compensation Board to artificially boost his average weekly wage to account for a presumption that younger workers wages increase faster in the early years of their careers. Workers compensation death claims are tragic for the families and challenging for the lawyers.

Workers Memorial Day - April 28, 2005

Last year seven of our clients died on the job. 2004 was the worst year for workers compensation death claims for our clients since the September 11th tragedy. Two deaths involved construction accidents, two were work related heart attacks, one involved a defective industrial machine, one was a motor vehicle accident, and perhaps the saddest was the work related suicide of a long time client who could not take the pain anymore. Our condolences go out to all the widows, children and other family members who lost loved ones in 2004. Across this great country of ours, we must continue to fight to make workplaces safer.

Last Thursday, April 28th, many of us honored the approximately 56,000 Americans who died last year due to work injuries and illnesses on Workers Memorial Day. This somber holiday was first observed in 1989, and since has become an annual remembrance at hundreds of worksites and communities across the nation. It complements the the Triangle Shirt Waist Fire Memorial Dinner we attended last month honoring those who died in that industrial tragedy. In a year packed with many holidays for many good reasons, I think sometimes Workers Memorial Day does not get the attention it deserves. However, those of us who represent widows and children in workers compensation claims are constantly reminded of the reasons for this important observance. We will never forget.

Suffolk Police Officers Honored for Bravery

Suffolk County is lucky to have some of the bravest police officers in the New York area. Last weekend, Bill Turley and a group of attorneys from our firm attended the Suffolk County Police Benevolent Association's Silver Shield Awards Dinner. For over ten years, we have had the privilege of being Workers Compensation Counsel to the PBA.

The Silver Shield Dinner is the PBA's night to honor individual police officers for specific heroic acts. One uplifting example was a group of three officers who responded to a call about a child laying face down in a pond. When the officers arrived, the child was not breathing. They immediately scooped the child into their arms, began CPR and transported him to Brookhaven Memorial Hospital. Eventually, the child began breathing on his own and was given a second chance at life. This was but one of the many inspiring stories of heroism heard that night.

Turley, Redmond & Rosasco salutes all the Silver Shield Recipients. We also congratulate our good friend and Suffolk PBA President, Jeff Frayler, on his installation along with the other fine officers of the PBA.

Turley, Redmond & Rosasco, LLP Launches Disabled Worker Law Blog

Helpful information for injured and disabled workers - that’s what this blog is all about. In non-lawyerly language, we will try to provide information that will be useful to the disabled, healthcare professionals, support groups, union officials, disability advocates, fellow attorneys and of course, our clients.

The blog is published by the full service disability law firm of Turley, Redmond & Rosasco, LLP. The firm represents clients in Workers Compensation, Social Security Disability, Long Term Disability (Private and ERISA) and Construction Accident cases throughout the New York metropolitan area. We have ten attorneys and a staff of over thirty who are dedicated to helping injured and disabled workers. If you live outside New York or our geographic area, we are members of national legal organizations, including the National Organization of Social Security Claimant Representatives (NOSSCR) and the Workers Injury and Law Advocacy Group (WILG),and would be glad to put you in contact with another well-qualified attorney who can help you.

Disabled workers are often times in desperate straits - physically, emotionally and financially. They need an attorney to help explain the disability maze and fight for all the benefits they deserve. This blog will supply you with the information you need to help make important life decisions about your legal cases.

We will not shy away from taking a stand for disabled workers who are fighting insurance companies or the government. We will expose injustices perpetrated on the disabled by some uncaring and disinterested employers. At the same time, we respect all opinions and welcome comments by those who might disagree with us, even our adversaries! Most importantly, we hope this blog makes the world of disability, workers’ compensation and accident claims more transparent. The more our clients know about their claims, the better we can represent their legal interests. Welcome and enjoy!